2.25.2010

Innovation & the Doctrine of Justification

Lord-willing, I will graduate in May with a Masters of Divinity in the School of Theology. During my time here, I have been exposed to a lot of thinkers and ideas, and I have been struck by how some scholars are infatuated with novelty. It’s understandable in some ways. I am all for fresh ideas, but there are many very old ideas that need no reformulation. The doctrine of justification is one of them. This doctrine has become one of the most contested doctrines in evangelical theology. Evangelicals used to be known for a robust belief in forensic justification, that sinners are declared to be in the right before God through faith in Jesus Christ. Now however, confusion abounds. One thinks of the New Perspective, the Federal Vision, Evangelicals & Catholics Together, denials of imputation, denials of faith alone as the sole ground of justification on the final day, and a thousand nuances within each of these. With all the dissenting voices, seminary students can lose confidence in their own understanding of justification. The thinking goes, “After all, James Dunn has spent a whole lot more time in his Greek New Testament than I have. And Ed Sanders knows 1st Century history much better than I. And of course, who can resist N.T. Wright’s big picture theology? Have you heard his accent? He must be right.”

I want to encourage every pastor, missionary, biblical counselor, and campus worker to master the precious doctrine of justification. Historically it is been bound up with the gospel itself. Now it has become popular to define the gospel in terms that are much more cosmic, and less individualistic. So Bishop Wright describes the gospel simply as “the proclamation of the Lordship of Jesus Christ.”[1] Of course that is part of the gospel, and of course the gospel is cosmic in its scope, but it is also “ruggedly” individual. Some of these writers are masters of the false dichotomy, as Ligon Duncan puts it. Yes, let’s proclaim the new creation. Yes, let’s push social justice. Yes, let’s teach the unification of Jew and Gentile in Christ. But let us never do these things at the expense of the individual. People matter, and therefore their individual standing before a holy God matters.
Moreover, it is pretty clear that the Apostle Paul thought justification was bound up with the gospel as well. Before expounding on justification in Galatians, he says that anyone who preaches a different gospel is accursed (1:8-9). In Galatians 3:8, Paul writes, “And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, ‘In you shall all the nations be blessed’ (ESV).” In Romans 1:16-17, Paul writes that the righteousness (same root as justify) of God is revealed in the gospel. So master and be mastered by justification and you will master and be mastered by the gospel.

How can we do this? My best advice would be to study the Bible. Become deeply familiar with Romans and Galatians. Take exegesis classes. I am currently in Dr. Schreiner’s Galatians class and have more than once thought to myself, “Martin Luther knew his Greek New Testament well.” The Bible is our final authority. After gaining a firm handle on the New Testament teaching, one could be helped by the following books by our own faculty: Dr. Vickers’ Jesus’ Blood and Righteousness, Dr. Schreiner’s The Law and Its Fulfillment, and relevant sections in his Pauline and New Testament theologies, and Dr. Seifrid’s monograph, Christ, Our Righteousness. Two other helpful resources are Stephen Westerholm’s Perspectives Old and New on Paul, and John Piper’s The Future of Justification.

So brothers and sisters, learn this doctrine well. Teach it, preach it, live it, and plead with sinners, knowing that our only hope and their only hope for a right standing with God is through faith in Jesus Christ: to him be the glory.

[1] N.T. Wright, What Saint Paul Really Said (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 133



(Previously published in Towers 1/4/10)

2.20.2010

King James

We went to Indianapolis with some friends the other day to watch Lebron James beat the Pacers, and Bill Simmons is right: King James commanded the whole room. We were witnesses. Simmons says, "Know this: The Kobe-LeBron argument is dead. It's over. LeBron James is the best basketball player alive." I agree.

Rumor has it, Lebron is considering the Mavericks in 2010 if the Cavs can't pull it off. That would be nice.

2.14.2010

Luther & Calvin Devo's

I have always used devotionals to open my heart before I pray and read Scripture in the mornings. There are several great devotionals available: Carson's For the Love of God 1 & 2, Piper's A Godward Life 1 & 2 (and several others), Spurgeon's Morning and Evening, Tripp's Whiter Than Snow, the Ancient Christian Devotional to name a few. However, in this post, I wanted to point you to two devotionals I have recently used and been edified by:

Faith Alone: A Daily Devotional - Martin Luther ed. by James Galvin

The Soul of Life: The Piety of John Calvin ed. by Joel Beeke

If you are a Protestant, you are very dependent on these two giants. Sadly most of us have neglected them. These two resources are great introductions to their thought. Take and Read.

2.04.2010

2010 John Bunyan Conference

The info for the 2010 John Bunyan Conference is now up. The dates are Monday April 26 - Wednesday April 28. I am delighted to be speaking again at this year's conference. If you have questions regarding New Covenant Theology, it should be helpful. Here is a tentative schedule of speakers and topics (one speaker is yet to be confirmed):

  • John Reisinger will speak on “Continuity and Discontinuiy” and the “Active and Passive Obedience of Christ.”
  • Jack Jefferies will speak on “Seeing the New Testament through New Covenant eyes: Two Test Texts – The Point of the Parentheses in Romans 2:13-15 and 1 Corinthians 9:21.”
  • Blake White will have two messages on “The Law of Christ.”
  • Fred Zaspel did his doctrinal thesis on B.B. Warfield and will share the results with two messages on this great giant of the past.

2.01.2010

Edwards on Discontinuity

"There is perhaps no part of divinity attended with so much intricacy, and wherein orthodox divines do so much differ, as the stating of the precise agreement and difference between the two dispensations of Moses and of Christ. And probably the reason why God has left it so intricate, is because our understanding the ancient dispensation, and God's design in it, is not of so great importance, nor does it so nearly concern us. Since God uses great plainness of speech in the New Testament, which is as it were the charter and municipal law of the christian church, what need we run back to the ceremonial and typical institutions of an antiquated dispensation, wherein God's declared design was, to deliver divine things in comparative obscurity, hid under a veil, and involved in clouds?"

--Jonthan Edwards, "An Humble Inquiry."